Visit Counter

Wednesday, January 16, 2013

Tour de Fraud



Update
1-17-2013


Lance Armstrong has been stripped of his 2000 Olympic Games cycling time trial bronze medal by the International Olympic Committee, continuing his spectacular fall from grace.'We have written asking for the return of the medal from the Sydney 2000 Games,' an IOC official told Reuters on Thursday after the decision to take away the last major title won by the disgraced American.
The move was confirmed to the AP on the same day that Armstrong's admission of using performance-enhancing drugs – after years of denials – is to be broadcast in an interview with Oprah Winfrey.

This confirms what I said below.



Over 20 years of lies. I see no upside for Armstrong coming clean after all this time. I don't know what Oprah paid him but it wasn't enough. 




Don't get me wrong. I'm not defending him. The only thing he had left was the uncertainty he skillfully placed in some people's minds. Those people who never believed had their suspicions confirmed. Those who did now see him for the liar he is. Up until about a year ago I believed him myself. The sad reality for Lance Armstrong is he probably would have won 7 Tour de France titles without doping up. 




Maybe Oprah could get Barry on.. they could talk about.... Solyndra, Fast and Furious, Benghazi. The WH leaks...etc...

Don't bet on it.






Share/Bookmark

Tuesday, January 15, 2013

Absurdity taken to new level




On a tip from Ed Kilbane



If this doesn't take the cake...

Somebody Needs to be Held Accountable for my 15 kids

(If video won't load click post title)


Video 1



If she want's to know what's accountable she should look between her legs. Worry not. Barry will be sending this worthless bag of excrement a check in short order. How do you help people who are too stupid to know they're the problem? Her co-conspirator who fathered 10 is in jail. Would it really make any difference if he wasn't? Who are the other 5 with? Does she even know? BTW...What do you think the prospects are for any of these children leading a meaningful and productive life?

This is only one spoke in a giant wheel. Conservatives demand an end to rewarding bad behavior, accepting personal responsibility, and as far as possible, ending welfare. The Liberals retort comes across usually something like this...why punish the children for the sins of the parents?


What's the end result? We are trapped in a vicious cycle, morally wrong for everybody involved, with no end in sight.







Share/Bookmark

Monday, January 14, 2013

Government picks and chooses their own crime stats to advance their agenda.




Allow me to site an example.  Liberals... as in Barry, Feinstein, Bloomberg, among others want a ban on assault rifles. They try to tie them to the Newtown shooting the same way they tried to tie Romney to the death of Joe Soptic's wife. As horrific and tragic as this event was, and realizing this is of no consolation for the families involved, the truth is Adam Lanza never took the rifle from the back seat of the car.



On a tip from Ed Kilbane




This is an objective, homemade video explaining some of the numbers on gun violence in the US and how the media and politicians are ignoring the real numbers and attempting to play on emotions. Violent crime has been declining for many years in the US, and compared to the UK, we have a much lower overall rate.






Video 2












Share/Bookmark

Sunday, January 13, 2013

Top Senate Dems urge Obama to take unilateral action on debt ceiling





Don't be surprised if he doesn't try to take unilateral action on your guns too! I thought his middle initial "H" stood for Hussein. But now it has morphed into  Hugo.

Only in the minds of this asshole administration would we even be discussing a trillion dollar coin. It's worth a trillion dollars? Based on what? Barry says it is?



This is classic Obamanomics. More smoke and mirrors. Like stealing from Medicare to pay for Obamacare. This latest stunt could backfire in his face. Moody's has already threatened a downgrade. Now that Barry has raised taxes on the wealthy, and middle income people who were to stupid to realize it, by raising the debt ceiling and bypassing Congress, a downgrade is almost a certainty. This will put Barry in a new light. One, by circumventing Congress (not the first time) he set in stone his legacy as the new Chavez. Two, he will be the only president in our Nation's history to ever receive a downgrade, not one but two, while they were at the helm. And he will achieved this with less then 5 years in office. What a distinction!

Pretty soon we'll need China to co-sign to buy Barry another vacation.




$10.6 trillion at the time. Now look at it!




And another is on the way!


WASHINGTON – If President Obama were to break the impasse with Republicans over raising the debt limit by taking unilateral action, such a move would have the potential to set off a firestorm of controversy and spark a protracted legal battle.

Top Senate Democrats say, go for it.

The White House has dismissed talk that Obama would rely on unusual measures to raise the nation's debt limit without Congress' approval, but administration officials also have warned that the country could default on its debt and trigger a new economic crisis if lawmakers don't increase the limit on borrowing.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., is among those urging Obama to consider options like invoking the 14th Amendment to the Constitution to find ways around the $16.4 trillion legal cap on government borrowing. The amendment states that the "validity of the public debt of the United States ... shall not be questioned," which some lawmakers believe permits a way out of the debt limit jam.

The government hit the debt limit last month and is juggling the books to buy additional time for Congress to act. But those moves only buy a few weeks of wiggle room, which requires Congress to act -- likely by mid- to late-February -- to avoid a market-quaking default on U.S. obligations.

The White House has said emphatically that it does not believe that the 14th Amendment permits Obama to ignore the debt cap on U.S. borrowing, though it considered the question during the 2011 debt crisis.

"There is no Plan B. There is no backup plan," White House spokesman Jay Carney said Wednesday. "There is no alternative to Congress raising the debt ceiling."

A letter to Obama on Friday from Reid and Sens. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., and Patty Murray, D-Wash., doesn't mention the 14th Amendment, but aides to the senators said that's what they have in mind in urging the president to consider unilateral action.

"We believe you must be willing to take any lawful steps to ensure that America does not break its promises and trigger a global economic crisis -- without congressional approval, if necessary," the letter said.

Battling House and Senate leaders have made virtually no progress on a strategy for legislation to lift the debt cap. House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, insists that any debt increase be matched by equivalent spending cuts. Obama, buoyed by his re-election victory, says he won't negotiate as he did in 2011, when he traded a $2.1 trillion debt increase for tight spending limits on agency budgets and automatic, across-the-board spending cuts if a congressional "supercommittee" failed to reach a budget agreement.

"Senate Democrats cannot ignore their responsibilities for political convenience -- and the American people will not tolerate an increase in the debt limit without spending cuts and reforms," said Boehner spokesman Michael Steel.

The impasse has people on both sides scratching their heads over how it will be resolved. The anxiety is such that some on the left are urging Obama to mint a coin worth perhaps $1 trillion to be deposited at the Federal Reserve and drawn upon to meet government obligations.



Share/Bookmark

Saturday, January 12, 2013

Delusions of grandeur







Should have put Barry on here.





According to the second most dumb doofus in command Barry is considering using executive privilege to ban guns in some form. He feels embolden after the election; perhaps enough to believe he has the authority to abolish the 2nd Amendment.

 What is scary, Biden is in control or at the very least, giving advice on who should own guns. What could be worse?

Oh yes… you guessed it… the involvement of the ACLU... But wait... If I didn't know better I would have thought they had lockjaw. They have said zilch. Why? These bastards are between the proverbial rock and a hard place! Their natural instinct...side with Barry. Yet their very name screeches "civil liberties". 
What to do? 
Solution: 
Assert the 2nd Amendment never said what it actually said. 
Mark my words.








 Take a look at these three. Do they appear to be  predisposed to following the law?












As far as I can tell none of them had a criminal record prior to their acts of violence.

Taking this in consideration when we buy a gun maybe some of the pertinent questions should be.

Have you seen a psychiatrist in the last 7 years? 
If so why?

Have you ever been treated for any mental disorder?

Are you currently taking medication for any mental condition?
Have you ever taken medication for any mental condition
Follow this up with some sort of a data bank similar to the ones they have with convicted felons.



Except for what I just indicated this whole gun control debate is a fallacy. It's estimated they are 200 to 300 million guns in America. Millions of these guns date back to the 1960's and far earlier... WW2 and WW1.. long before we had strict gun laws. Another thing about a gun. Properly cleaned and oiled it will last indefinitely. Lets be practical. Our government can't find the intestinal fortitude to get rid of 12 million illegals. How in the hell are they going to get rid of 300 million guns?

The end result of more government intervention?

Law abiding citizens will find it increasingly more difficult to own a gun.

Status quo for the criminal.







Share/Bookmark