Trump Blasts Obama for Speech on Orlando Attack: He ‘Was More Angry at Me Than He Was at the Shooter’

During a speech about the Orlando terrorist attack Tuesday, President Barack Obama criticized Donald Trump for his rhetoric about Muslims, and the presumptive Republican nominee responded during a rally in Greensboro, N.C.

“I watched President Obama today, and he was more angry at me than he was at the shooter,” the billionaire businessman told rally-goers.

During his speech earlier, Obama lambasted the real estate developer for his “dangerous” policy ideas and his proposed ban on Muslims entering the U.S., asking, “Do Republican officials actually agree with this?”

“Because that’s not the America we want,” he continued. “It doesn’t reflect our Democratic ideals. It will make us less safe.”

In order for us to be safe we should continue to adhere to Barry's foolproof policies of stricter gun control laws for people who don't follow the law and simultaneously release terrorists from Gitmo in the delusional belief in will thwart terrorism.

If a reporter asked Barry...Isn't releasing the Gitmo detainees your attempt at placating terrorism?

After chiding the reporter "for his obvious stupidity" Barry answers, "Of course not." 

Reporter's follow up:

"Then why did you release them?"

Of course, they would never ask this because they're too busy kissing his ass.

After seeing the president’s comments, Trump critiqued Obama’s “level of anger.”

“The level of anger … that’s the kind of anger he should have for the shooter and these killers that shouldn’t be here,” Trump said.

Trump added that “many people” agreed with his perspective, paraphrasing a political pundit he saw on Fox News Tuesday who suggested the Republican candidate was getting under Obama’s skin.

“Nobody at the end of that speech understood anything other than, ‘Boy does he hate Donald Trump,’” the Republican said.

During his speech on the Orlando shooting, Obama also addressed why he does not use the phrase “radical Islam.” According to the commander in chief, using that phrase would make no difference in the way the administration or military addresses the issue.

“What exactly would using this label accomplish?” he asked. “What exactly would it change? Would it make ISIL less committed to trying to kill Americans? Would it bring in more allies? Is there a military strategy that is served by this?”

“The answer is, none of the above,” Obama continued. “Calling a threat by a different name does not make it go away.”

(Really... who came up with workplace violence?)

Trump Blasts Obama for Speech on Orlando Attack: He ‘Was More Angry at Me Than He Was at the Shooter’

This is beyond disgusting

Imam who called for execution of gays preached at Orlando-area mosque weeks before massacre

Why is this Muslim dog who lives in Iran allowed to travel the world and come to this country spreading his message of hate/death and allowed to return to Iran? A better question. Why was the guy who shot the “Benghazi video” jailed and this guy is allowed to roam free?

Anyone remember this?

Saeed Abedini Freed From Iranian Prison After Three Years

The end result of visiting Iran as a pastor of the Christian faith. And he wasn't the only one!

Liberals:

Why is it Muslims can preach death to gays encouraging Jihadists to kill fifty with seemingly no consequences?

Trump said he wanted to ban Muslims, killed no one, yet the repercussions and the outrage over his "hates immigrants" statement were met with violent protests. Since this latest attack in Orlando have you seen any protesters walking around with signs...Down with Islam? 

Where are they?

Does anyone think this is a bit odd? Mateen killed 50 with virtually no protests. Officer Wilson shot Michael Brown, a third-rate thug, in self-defense and half the country went berserk! I just don't understand how this country thinks. If Mateen were Stump Donaldson a Roman Catholic and shot 50 Muslims at the local mosque Barry, the US citizenry, the press, and the rest of the world would be all over it. They're on it you say? Yes, they are in a tepid sort of way. Reluctant to call it for what it is as Barry continues his two-step around the real issue... Muslim terrorism.

We are total fools managed by one who has his own agenda he can no longer hide.

------------------------------------

Video 249

According to reports, Sheikh Farrokh Sekaleshfar was recently invited to speak at the Husseini Islamic Center just outside of Orlando. His sermon—which occurred behind closed doors—was allegedly entitled “How to deal with the phenomenon of homosexuality.”

A firebrand Muslim cleric noted for sermons calling for gay people to be executed reportedly preached at an Orlando-area mosque just weeks before a homegrown terrorist gunned down at least 49 people at a gay nightclub.

Sheikh Farrokh Sekaleshfar, a British-born scholar who currently lives in Iran and travels the world to spread his hateful message, preached at the Husseini Islamic Center in the Orlando suburb of Sanford last month. The sermon -- delivered behind closed doors -- was titled, “How to deal with the phenomenon of homosexuality” and raised the ire of local LGBT community leaders.

The sermon came just three years after Sekaleshfar had spoken at another engagement in the U.S. where he discussed his twisted idea of “compassion” for gay people.

“Death is the sentence. There’s nothing to be embarrassed about this. Death is the sentence,” Sekaleshfar said during a 2013 sermon at the University of Michigan, according to Orlando-based WFTV 9. “We have to have that compassion for people. With homosexuals, it’s the same. Out of compassion, let’s get rid of them now.”

Officials for the Husseini Islamic Center said that they were not privy to the sheikh’s prior comments.

“The management at the Husseini Islamic Center were unaware of these remarks when he was invited,” a representative of the Orlando mosque told Fusion.net. “Please understand that the singular views of guest speakers do not represent those of the Husseini Islamic Center. We want to reiterate that nothing, absolutely nothing, can justify yesterday’s atrocious actions.”

The news site also received comment from Sekaleshfar via Facebook in which he referred to shooter Omar Mateen as “an ill and perverted, animalistic entity who has abused an ideology to satiate his sad, twisted desires.”

“I am totally against the barbaric act of violence that has happened. In no way at all can such a killing be justified Islamically,” he said.

When asked about his alleged comments in March in Orlando regarding gays, Sekaleshfar chalked it up to “academic discussion” and that he was describing a “theoretical angle as to what Islam says.”

“I never gave the call to a death sentence,” he told Fusion, adding that his speech in 2013 had been taken out of context. “I was explaining what Islamic law – in a country whose people democratically desired Islamic law to be exercised – states in relation to NOT homosexuals, but rather in relation to when the act of anal copulation is executed in such an aforementioned public.”

This is beyond disgusting

Barry's take...

Hate crime. Kills 9.

The Confederate flag needs to come down. His crime demands the complete removal of our Southern history. Statues of prominent Confederate generals  across the country need to be removed as well as street names such as Robert E. Lee Blvd need to be changed because we are so offended by our Southern heritage we simply can't survive... although we have survived quite well since the Civil War. I'm not defending this guy. Just an observation. Who comes off as the bigger threat. A red neck racist or a Muslim terrorist? 

Hate Crime. Kills 50 (so far)

Can't bring himself to call this dog a Muslim terrorist although he singlehandedly killed more people in a terrorist attack than anyone else since 911! After all, he's just practicing his religious freedom, Sharia Law, which requires the killing of homosexuals. The... "confusion" over what bathroom to use may have been the last straw'. 

BTW... Why is the answer to terrorism always gun control but they never address who pulls the trigger. When did guns start walking into nightclubs and firing by themselves?

Brace yourself for the onslaught of Muslims racing to the nearest news network to denounce this latest attack.

This is the way the liberal mindset works: 

Barry's take...

3rd time a charm? San Francisco to try yet again to give illegal immigrants voting rights

This entire article could be summed up in one sentence. If you are against illegals voting it's because you're a racist. 

After reading the article why would anyone not want to come here illegally? What is the deterrent? Why be frustrated standing in line when you can just walk right in?

Another example of out-and-out insanity:

Tempers Flare When Huntington Park Appoints Undocumented Immigrants To City Commissions

----------------------------------

After two failed bids to grant voting rights to illegal immigrants, some San Francisco officials believe they have found the man who can make it happen: Donald Trump.

A proposed charter amendment drafted by Board of Supervisors member Eric Mar would give illegal immigrants with kids in the public school system the right to vote in school elections. Voters have rejected two previous ballot proposals, but Mar is betting on anti-Trump sentiment to carry the pro-illegal immigrant proposal if he can get it on the November ballot.

“With Donald Trump’s racist and anti-immigrant sentiments, there is a reaction from many of us who are disgusted by those politics," Mar said. "I think that’s going to ensure there is strong Latino turnout as well as other immigrant turnout.”

A key promise in Trump's campaign for the Republican nomination for president has been to build a wall on the Mexican border. This week, Trump claimed a federal judge overseeing a lawsuit against Trump University wouldn’t be impartial because he is of Mexican heritage.

Mar staffers confirmed the measure will go before the rules committee within weeks, and could then be presented to the full board of supervisors. If a majority support it, the charter amendment will be on the ballot Nov. 8 when the city and nation votes for president.

“The time is right for San Francisco to make history, to pave the way for immigrant parents to have a say in the policy decisions that impact their child’s education and who gets to sit on the Board of Education,” Mar said in a written statement.

In 2004, voters narrowly rejected the same proposal. A similar measure, introduced by California Assemblymember David Chiu, D-San Francisco, failed in 2010 with just 46 percent of the vote. 

just 46 percent!!!

Chiu believes Trump's presence on the ballot, and the fact that one of every three children in the system is now the child of an immigrant parent could make the third time a charm.

(This is an extremely serious situation which Californians are too stupid to realize. You see in their mind there is no distinction between illegal/immigrant. They will probably have to run it up to 9 out of every 10 in the system is illegal before they realize they just surrendered their own country to foreigners) 

Name me another country that even thinks about giving illegals the right to vote?

“With the anti-immigrant rhetoric from Donald Trump, it is more important than ever that we come together as San Franciscans to stand up for our immigrant communities and support their civic engagement,” Chiu said in a written statement.

The plan is “bad public policy,” according to Hans von Spakovsky, senior legal fellow at The Heritage Foundation and former Federal Elections Commission member.

“It is wrong to extend the vote to individuals who have not entered the American social compact or made a commitment to the our Constitution, our law, and our cultural and political heritage by becoming citizens,” von Spakovsky said. “It is even worse to extend the franchise to illegal aliens whose very first act is to violate our laws; that encourages contempt for the law.”

While laws in all 50 states bar noncitizens from voting in state elections, and federal law makes it a felony for noncitizens to vote in federal elections, there is an opening in local elections, von Spakovsky acknowledged.

Seven jurisdictions - including 6 in Maryland and one in Chicago – afforded voting rights to noncitizens, Ron Hayduk, a political science professor at Queens College of the City University of New York, told the Chronicle.

3rd time a charm? San Francisco to try yet again to give illegal immigrants voting rights

Muslim massacres 50 in Orlando

Barry only spoke for a handful of minutes, but reminded the country of his position on gun control, though didn't bring up 'radical Islamic terror'.

Why acknowledge the significance of the person's ideology who perpetrated the crime? I mean... it's not like he was as bad as this red neck George Wallace/David Duke protégé which demanded the total destruction of our Southern heritage.



It could have been worse. Had this bastard been working at the Pulse nightclub. 

It would have been deemed workplace violence.

Muslim massacres 50 in Orlando