Visit Counter

Friday, June 17, 2016

How much you wanna bet...




This woman was in the [subject box] in quite a few of those 31,000 deleted emails.

"He said one of his letters was even "deceptively" marked classified "to limit my ability to create a public furor over how Sabrina had been and continues to be mistreated."





Ex-CIA officer facing jail in Italy claims Clinton, State Department ignored her pleas


Sabrina De Sousa in 2012. (Nikki Kahn/The Washington Post via AP) 


A former CIA officer and diplomat who has repeatedly denied playing a role in one of the most notorious U.S. counterterrorism programs is set to become the only American held accountable for it -- and claims the Obama administration has abandoned her.

Sabrina De Sousa, who is stuck in Portugal and awaiting extradition to Italy over her alleged role in the rendition of a terror suspect years ago, claims the State Department has ignored repeated requests to intervene on her behalf. She and her lawyers are particularly critical of Hillary Clinton, who still has not commented on the case. 

Mark S. Zaid, an attorney who previously worked with De Sousa, told FoxNews.com his firm made "multiple efforts" to reach out to the State Department -- specifically then-Secretary of State Clinton -- and that "every time we were completely rebuffed with silence."

He said one of his letters was even "deceptively" classified "to limit my ability to create a public furor over how Sabrina had been and continues to be mistreated."

They marked it classified so they couldn't make a big stink about it. In other words... they wanted her in the position she was in. Which makes the stench of her "classified" email scandal even more appalling! 


De Sousa, a naturalized American from India, was arrested in Portugal last October and earlier this month lost her latest court bid to halt her extradition to Italy. She faces four years in prison there over her alleged role in the rendition of a suspected terrorist 13 years ago.

De Sousa has launched numerous unsuccessful bids over the years to clear her name, but has received little known help from the government she served for more than a decade.

If she's sent to prison, she would become the first CIA officer and U.S. diplomat imprisoned over the controversial rendition program. 

Implemented under President George W. Bush, the program transferred terror suspects to other countries for detention and interrogation. De Sousa, along with about two dozen other CIA agents and an Air Force official, were convicted in absentia in Italy in 2009 on kidnapping and other charges related to the abduction of Osama Mustapha Hassan Nasr, known also as Abu Omar, under the rendition program.

Omar, a radical cleric, was taken while walking down a street in Milan and flown to Egypt where he was held prisoner for four years without a trial before eventually being released. Omar claims during that time he was tortured.


Omar also was convicted in absentia in Italy of "criminal association for the purposes of international terrorism" and sentenced to six years in prison. Prosecutors claim he collaborated with 13 other suspected terrorists between 2000 and 2003 with the intent of carrying out terrorist attacks around the world. 

Around the time of the rendition, De Sousa, 60, worked under diplomatic cover and was stationed in Milan.

On the specific day in question, though, De Sousa claims she was chaperoning her son's school ski trip in northern Italy – about 200 miles from Milan. 

De Sousa recently detailed her frustration over the situation to VICE. During the in-depth interview, she didn't pull punches at who she thinks is hurting her shot at freedom.

"There needs to be an explanation instead of a no comment," De Sousa said about Clinton's careful avoidance of the issue. "She already has the issue of Benghazi, which was diplomatic. And now we have a U.S. diplomat going to prison, that's two things."

De Sousa believes Clinton could still do the right thing.

"I think the most important thing Secretary Clinton can do now is comment," De Sousa told VICE. "So going in, if she becomes president, then at least everyone knows her position on it."

A State Department official told FoxNews.com that they are aware of the De Sousa situation: 

"We have seen reports that a Portuguese Court has acceded to the Italian government's request for the extradition of Sabrina de Sousa. We refer you to the Italian and Portuguese governments for further information."

De Sousa's extradition was recently raised during a European Parliament hearing where a resolution was passed calling upon member states to formally investigate Europe's role in U.S. renditions.

Ana Gomes, a member of the European Parliament, called De Sousa a "scapegoat" and said those truly responsible for renditions were being protected.

VICE also spoke with Abu Omar, who said he supports a pardon or immunity for De Sousa.

The irony isn't lost on De Sousa.

"A former agency employee said to me – 'How embarrassing is it going to be for the CIA when the terrorist starts to support you in this whole story?'" she reportedly said.

Glen Caplin, a spokesman for Clinton's campaign, told FoxNews.com that they "can not comment on the specifics of a case that is working its way through the legal systems of two other countries" and deferred "any questions to the U.S. government agencies."

Typical Clinton









Share/Bookmark

Thursday, June 16, 2016

Another dose of Islam


Family of beheaded Canadian backs no ransom policy

With all the hoopla going on in Orlando this story snuck in under the radar. A day doesn't go by without reading another Muslim attack took place somewhere around the globe. Let's face it. Muslims are never, repeat NEVER, going to assimilate into any society regardless of what country they migrate to. They hold no loyalty, no honor, no patriotism for the countries they try to colonize. They have only one allegiance ...Islam.

During WWII the Japs and the Nazis never attacked us on our own soil. On 911 we lost almost 3,000 (more than Pearl Harbor) and have experienced numerous Muslim attacks ever since. Islam is a movement and ideology, a curse if you will, and not a religion. 

There are approximately 1.57 billion Muslims in the world. If 99.9% (which Barry claims) are so-called "good/moderate Muslims" that still leaves 1.57 million Muslims unaccounted for. Nobody knows the real number but if my figures are anywhere near correct that would rank them, from a personnel standpoint, as one of the largest militaries in the world.


Maybe it's time we woke up.




FILE - This file image made from undated militant video, shows Canadians Robert Hall, left, and John Ridsdel, right. With a black Islamic State group-style flag as a backdrop, Abu Sayyaf fighters beheaded Canadian hostage Hall on southern Jolo island on Monday, June 13, 2016, after a ransom deadline passed. Enraged by the beheading of a second Canadian hostage by ransom-seeking Abu Sayyaf extremists, Philippine troops pressed a major offensive in the south Tuesday, June 14, 2016, but there was no sign of an end to the small but brutal insurgency that a new president will inherit in about two weeks. (Militant Video via AP Video, File) NO SALES, MANDATORY CREDIT (The Associated Press)



OTTAWA, Ontario – Relatives of a Canadian man beheaded by Islamic militants in the Philippines say they agree with Canada's policy of not paying ransom for hostages.

Robert Hall had been held hostage by the militant Abu Sayyaf group since September 2015 and was beheaded this week after a deadline for a ransom payment passed.

Hall's family said Tuesday in a statement that every option to free him was considered and efforts to that end were "vast and exhaustive."

In the end, the family says it agrees with Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's directive that money not be paid to hostage takers who seek to undermine fundamental Canadian values.

The family says it will remember Hall, who was born in 1949, as a self-made man who worked his entire life to raise his family above the hardships of his own youth.

(Only to have his head chopped off by a Muslim)







Share/Bookmark

Wednesday, June 15, 2016

Who Pays For The Signs?



 On a tip from Ed Kilbane

Whole new meaning of the word ’agitators’.....Check out the website!


If you’ve been watching the news, you undoubtedly have seen many people holding up signs.


Those people did not print them themselves. On the bottom of the signs is the inscription: revcom.us[revcom.us]

To see who printed them, go to:

And then forward this to everyone on the planet!






Share/Bookmark

Trump Blasts Obama for Speech on Orlando Attack: He ‘Was More Angry at Me Than He Was at the Shooter’





During a speech about the Orlando terrorist attack Tuesday, President Barack Obama criticized Donald Trump for his rhetoric about Muslims, and the presumptive Republican nominee responded during a rally in Greensboro, N.C.

“I watched President Obama today, and he was more angry at me than he was at the shooter,” the billionaire businessman told rally-goers.

During his speech earlier, Obama lambasted the real estate developer for his “dangerous” policy ideas and his proposed ban on Muslims entering the U.S., asking, “Do Republican officials actually agree with this?”

“Because that’s not the America we want,” he continued. “It doesn’t reflect our Democratic ideals. It will make us less safe.”

In order for us to be safe we should continue to adhere to Barry's foolproof policies of stricter gun control laws for people who don't follow the law and simultaneously release terrorists from Gitmo in the delusional belief in will thwart terrorism.

If a reporter asked Barry...Isn't releasing the Gitmo detainees your attempt at placating terrorism?

After chiding the reporter "for his obvious stupidity" Barry answers, "Of course not." 

Reporter's follow up:
"Then why did you release them?"

Of course, they would never ask this because they're too busy kissing his ass.



After seeing the president’s comments, Trump critiqued Obama’s “level of anger.”

“The level of anger … that’s the kind of anger he should have for the shooter and these killers that shouldn’t be here,” Trump said.

Trump added that “many people” agreed with his perspective, paraphrasing a political pundit he saw on Fox News Tuesday who suggested the Republican candidate was getting under Obama’s skin.

“Nobody at the end of that speech understood anything other than, ‘Boy does he hate Donald Trump,’” the Republican said.

During his speech on the Orlando shooting, Obama also addressed why he does not use the phrase “radical Islam.” According to the commander in chief, using that phrase would make no difference in the way the administration or military addresses the issue.

“What exactly would using this label accomplish?” he asked. “What exactly would it change? Would it make ISIL less committed to trying to kill Americans? Would it bring in more allies? Is there a military strategy that is served by this?”

“The answer is, none of the above,” Obama continued. “Calling a threat by a different name does not make it go away.”

(Really... who came up with workplace violence?)







Share/Bookmark

Tuesday, June 14, 2016

This is beyond disgusting




Imam who called for execution of gays preached at Orlando-area mosque weeks before massacre



Why is this Muslim dog who lives in Iran allowed to travel the world and come to this country spreading his message of hate/death and allowed to return to Iran? A better question. Why was the guy who shot the “Benghazi video” jailed and this guy is allowed to roam free?

Anyone remember this?


The end result of visiting Iran as a pastor of the Christian faith. And he wasn't the only one!







Liberals:


Why is it Muslims can preach death to gays encouraging Jihadists to kill fifty with seemingly no consequences?

Trump said he wanted to ban Muslims, killed no one, yet the repercussions and the outrage over his "hates immigrants" statement were met with violent protests. Since this latest attack in Orlando have you seen any protesters walking around with signs...Down with Islam? 

Where are they?

Does anyone think this is a bit odd? Mateen killed 50 with virtually no protests. Officer Wilson shot Michael Brown, a third-rate thug, in self-defense and half the country went berserk! I just don't understand how this country thinks. If Mateen were Stump Donaldson a Roman Catholic and shot 50 Muslims at the local mosque Barry, the US citizenry, the press, and the rest of the world would be all over it. They're on it you say? Yes, they are in a tepid sort of way. Reluctant to call it for what it is as Barry continues his two-step around the real issue... Muslim terrorism.

We are total fools managed by one who has his own agenda he can no longer hide.



------------------------------------






Video 249


According to reports, Sheikh Farrokh Sekaleshfar was recently invited to speak at the Husseini Islamic Center just outside of Orlando. His sermon—which occurred behind closed doors—was allegedly entitled “How to deal with the phenomenon of homosexuality.”

A firebrand Muslim cleric noted for sermons calling for gay people to be executed reportedly preached at an Orlando-area mosque just weeks before a homegrown terrorist gunned down at least 49 people at a gay nightclub.

Sheikh Farrokh Sekaleshfar, a British-born scholar who currently lives in Iran and travels the world to spread his hateful message, preached at the Husseini Islamic Center in the Orlando suburb of Sanford last month. The sermon -- delivered behind closed doors -- was titled, “How to deal with the phenomenon of homosexuality” and raised the ire of local LGBT community leaders.

The sermon came just three years after Sekaleshfar had spoken at another engagement in the U.S. where he discussed his twisted idea of “compassion” for gay people.

“Death is the sentence. There’s nothing to be embarrassed about this. Death is the sentence,” Sekaleshfar said during a 2013 sermon at the University of Michigan, according to Orlando-based WFTV 9. “We have to have that compassion for people. With homosexuals, it’s the same. Out of compassion, let’s get rid of them now.”

Officials for the Husseini Islamic Center said that they were not privy to the sheikh’s prior comments.

“The management at the Husseini Islamic Center were unaware of these remarks when he was invited,” a representative of the Orlando mosque told Fusion.net. “Please understand that the singular views of guest speakers do not represent those of the Husseini Islamic Center. We want to reiterate that nothing, absolutely nothing, can justify yesterday’s atrocious actions.”

The news site also received comment from Sekaleshfar via Facebook in which he referred to shooter Omar Mateen as “an ill and perverted, animalistic entity who has abused an ideology to satiate his sad, twisted desires.”

“I am totally against the barbaric act of violence that has happened. In no way at all can such a killing be justified Islamically,” he said.

When asked about his alleged comments in March in Orlando regarding gays, Sekaleshfar chalked it up to “academic discussion” and that he was describing a “theoretical angle as to what Islam says.”

“I never gave the call to a death sentence,” he told Fusion, adding that his speech in 2013 had been taken out of context. “I was explaining what Islamic law – in a country whose people democratically desired Islamic law to be exercised – states in relation to NOT homosexuals, but rather in relation to when the act of anal copulation is executed in such an aforementioned public.”







Share/Bookmark